Image Credit: Brent Moore / CC
The Center Square [By Jon Styf] –
Ever since court fines and fees rose in popularity as a funding mechanism for local criminal justice systems in the 1980s, the advocates for their removal have been scarce.
But, of late, more advocates have risen to propose cutting those fines and fees across the country.
Most recent is the “End Justice Fees” campaign from a coalition of the Fines and Fees Justice Center, Americans for Prosperity and the American Civil Liberties Union. The group will push for state legislative changes in the fines and fees structure.
The group will fill a void because, when the fines rose in popularity in the 1980s, there were not advocates for those charged with crimes to oppose the fines and fees.
“Who is coming in to say no?,” said Lisa Foster, co-director of the Fines and Fees Justice Center. “A bunch of people with felony convictions?”
In Tennessee, court fines and fees are widespread. But one issue is that data on those fines and fees are not compiled among the state’s 95 counties.
Sycamore Institute produced a series of reports last year on those fines and fees, finding that 360 are authorized by law in Tennessee, which collects nearly $38 million collectively each year from fines and fees, but likely collects less than 25% of the fines and fees that are assessed.
“It’s very hard to get a clear picture of exactly what is going on,” Foster said. ” How much is being assessed? How much is being collected?
“Policy should be data driven. … Tennessee doesn’t have it and seems to lack the capacity to produce it. Any business that operated that way would be out of business in a heartbeat.”
Foster said that one of the basic components of fines and fees reform is eliminating the suspension of drivers’ licenses for failure to pay fees, something she says conservative states such as Texas, Utah, Montana and West Virginia have done. She said law enforcement is often for that change, allowing officers to prevent more dangerous crime and spend less time arresting those on suspended licenses due to fees.
“If your goal is to collect money from someone, taking away that person’s means of getting to work is probably not a good idea,” Foster said. “But that’s precisely what we do.”
One of the most recent relevant reforms in Tennessee happened this year, when Shelby County eliminated medical co-pays for those in custody in local jails. In 2018, Shelby County eliminated phone call fees for youth in the juvenile system.
“We are asking the poorest among us to finance government and that just makes no sense from either a fiscal standpoint or a moral or policy standpoint,” Foster said. “If it is supposed to serve everyone, it should be paid for by everyone.”
About the Author: Jon Styf, The Center Square Staff Reporter – Jon Styf is an award-winning editor and reporter who has worked in Illinois, Texas, Wisconsin, Florida and Michigan in local newsrooms over the past 20 years, working for Shaw Media, Hearst and several other companies. Follow Jon on Twitter @JonStyf.
3 Responses
One of the few instances the ACLU is Right on.
Every once in a blue moon they do something that makes sense to most everyone
Yes, it is time to collect the data to accurately assess this process and the intended outcomes. Evaluate the data and the offenses, and possibly make some changes.
However, this could also be the first step to “CASHLESS BAIL” where anything goes. Give an inch at a time, and you eventually wake up in “New York,” Tennessee.
Show us the data before you act on this one. Remember that fees and fines are implemented in order to deter certain behaviors.