Weather Modification: I Think These Questions Need To Be Asked

Image Credit: Canva

by Danielle Goodrich [East Tennessee Freedom] –

I think these questions need to be asked.

The New York Times in July of 1972 ran an article titled, “Rainmaking Is Used As a Weapon by U.S.” in the article it said “The United States has been secretly seeding clouds over North Vietnam, Laos and South Vietnam to increase and control the rainfall for military purposes.”

There was another Times article from 2009, titled “In the Pursuit of Weather Modification” which the teaser verbiage read, “Weather modification is the ultimate impact on the environment. You are dumping toxic chemicals onto people, plants and animals and are…”

I listed a number of other articles including a CNN story from December 2020 that read “China to expand weather modification program to cover area larger than…” the article read, “In the next five years, the total area covered by artificial rain or snowfall will reach 5.5 million sq km.”

Augustus Doricko, the CEO from a weather modification company called Rainmaker located in California came to testify against our legislation. He didn’t want the Tennessee legislature stopping his company’s ability to operate in Tennessee. The Tennessee legislature disagreed.

After the catastrophic flooding in Dubai, Augustus Doricko took to Twitter saying that the flooding proved cloud-seeding worked. Missing the point that perhaps setting off such an imbalance in the weather shows man’s inability to control the weather and that perhaps man shouldn’t be meddling in complex dynamic systems he didn’t create.

Less than 24-hours after The New York Times hit piece on East Tennesseans hit, East Tennessee and bordering Western North Carolina were hit with catastrophic flooding of their own. The storm is being called a 1/1000 year historic weather event. Precipitated by a hurricane entering the country 600 miles to the South. The region had been inundated by rain leading up to the hurricane creating an already saturated environment that the rivers could not contain.

The Tennessee legislation was not the first weather modification ban in the United States. There were three states who banned weather modification in the 1960s; Maryland, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.

The Maryland legislation read, “Whereas a number of studies of weather control are being undertaken by the United States Congress, by other public groups and by private groups, and it is desirable to prevent further conflict until solutions can be found.”

At this point for anyone to think weather modification is theory when it has been in law since the 1960s and The New York Times own articles dating back to the 1970s, listed as a weapon of war since Vietnam, you are 60 years behind and asking the wrong questions.

The questions we should be asking now is, was rain used as a weapon in Eastern Tennessee and Western North Carolina? How was the most damage of a gulf hurricane found 600 miles North of landfall? What does this mean for the election next month when the most conservative part of a swing state has been decimated?

And if weaponized rain was a tool that our government has had for 60 years, what tools do they have now? This sure looks like a tool we should be questioning.

Dane Wigington says, in this video, “atmospheric frequency transmissions can and do have a repelling effect on air masses especially when the air masses have been seeded with electrically conductive nanoparticles… a migrating storm will be hindered by moving towards frequency transmission and will easily migrate in a direction with no transmissions. Was Hurricane Helene’s path and behavior just an act of nature, or was it engineered?”