K-12 Education Funding Has Doubled In Tennessee Since 1992

Photo: Tennessee Education Commissioner Penny Schwinn speaks with a student during a school visit Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2020, at Westwood Elementary School in Manchester, Tenn.  Photo Credit: Vivian Jones/The Center Square

The Center Square [By Jon Styf] –

K-12 education is the top expenditure in Tennessee’s budget and has more than doubled, adjusted for inflation, since the current school funding plan began in 1992, a Sycamore Institute report shows.

Tennessee Capitol Building in Nashville

Tennessee’s education funding model, called the Basic Education Program (BEP), is used to disperse state funds to individual school districts. Tennessee spent $5.2 billion on K-12 education in fiscal year 2020, while TennCare, the state’s Medicaid program and second-highest expense, cost the state $3.6 billion.

The state spent about $2.2 billion to fund schools in 1992, adjusted for 2020 dollars.

Brian Straessle, director of external affairs at the Sycamore Institute, said the nonprofit will be looking more into K-12 education funding this year since the BEP has been subject to lawsuits and criticism over the years. There is potential to make changes to the BEP in next year’s legislative session, he said. 

“There are few that really understand that formula,” Straessle said. “Some work like this (report) to create more understanding of how funding works can be helpful.”

Rather than giving a set amount or percentage of funding to each Local Education Association (LEA), the BEP formula uses 46 different components to determine how much each district will receive.

The primary source of revenue for BEP distribution is the state’s sales tax, which accounts for 95% of funding. Sales tax revenue accounts for 69% of the state’s $13 billion in general fund revenue each year.

“Local and federal dollars also help pay for education,” Sycamore Institute Director of Policy Mandy Pellegrin wrote. “In fiscal year 2019, for example, state revenues provided half the money for elementary and secondary education, 43 percent came from local revenues, and the rest from the federal government.”

Per-pupil spending has become the standard for analyzing school spending in recent years, especially after it became mandated to be released by each LEA by the federal Every Student Succeeds Act.

The Sycamore Institute used those numbers and adjusted it 2.3% annually for inflation since 1992 in its analysis.

***Click HERE to support Conservative Journalism in Tennessee. We can’t bring you stories like this without your support!***

“When you have more students, you generally need more money for teachers, facilities, textbooks, etc,” Pellegrin wrote. “Similar to accounting for inflation, looking at per-pupil spending helps us make meaningful comparisons over time as enrollment changes. It’s a good starting point for understanding how we fund education in Tennessee.”

The report showed 29% of the state’s dollars were spent on the Department of Education since 1992.

Straessle said the Sycamore Institute plans to do more in-depth looks at education funding and spending in the coming months as it continues to be a hot discussion issue heading into the new legislative session in January.

About the Author: Jon Styf, The Center Square Staff Reporter – Jon Styf is an award-winning editor and reporter who has worked in Illinois, Texas, Wisconsin, Florida and Michigan in local newsrooms over the past 20 years, working for Shaw Media, Hearst and several other companies. Follow Jon on Twitter @JonStyf.

3 thoughts on “K-12 Education Funding Has Doubled In Tennessee Since 1992

  • October 4, 2021 at 10:41 pm

    The funding has doubled but the education here in TN. has gotten worse. If the funding has doubled then why do children have to raise money do take a field trip, or to buy uniforms for sports. or anything. Something is wrong with this as the children are surely not getting the money. How about less MONEY for ADMINISTRATION and more money for students. Wow what a consept

  • October 5, 2021 at 10:46 pm

    Agree with above. Administration has increased more than teachers (%) In addition the basic learning % increase has not increased accordingly to the funds expended.
    As a retired tradesman, that had a four Apprentice Program and my training was upgraded by the Union. What does the Teachers Unions bring to their membership, as to up making sure their members have the support to be successful teachers.
    More money is not the answer for success, nor more Administration either.

  • October 16, 2021 at 1:22 pm

    And who is paying for all the testing? It seems the testing companies are sucking out the money as millions are charged for the “standardized” testing. Students take 8-12 tests all year. RIDICULOUS.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *