Image Credit: TN General Assembly & Canva
The Tennessee Conservative [By Olivia Lupia] –
Day 1 of the special legislative session called by Gov. Lee to redraw the state’s congressional map was not lengthy, but it did see continued outrage by Democrats and protestors as the rules were set for the real work to begin today.
Before either chamber gaveled into brief floor sessions on Tuesday afternoon, the House Rules Committee met to create the rules package that will be used by the body for the remainder of the session, including debate times and procedures.
Several changes were proposed by Democrats calling for more time and extra steps through the process, like extensive legal review or in-person meetings for public input, but all were voted down via voice vote by the Republican majority except for Democrat Rep. Justin Jones’ proposal which was determined via a roll call vote at the decision of Chairman William Lamberth.
The committee voted against Jones’ package 8-3 after he continuously called the session and the Republican members racist, a theme which carried through the afternoon. “No matter what rules are passed, no matter what decorum we try and perform, we have to be clear that this is about race,” he said. “They’re treating this like a game where Black people’s political power is expendable… You are spitting on the graves of our civil rights elders and martyrs.”
Ultimately, the only changes adopted by the committee were those proposed by Republican Rep. Clark Boyd. In addition to functioning in a state of “flow motion” where the regular rules are suspended and bills can move between chambers in the same day, Rep. Boyd’s changes also allow the House Speaker to appoint legislative committees.

But the biggest contention came from the change allowing the Speaker or any committee chair to remove individuals like protesters “deemed to be detrimental to the orderly business” from the House and bar them from reentry for the remainder of the entire special session. Current rules dictate that a removed individual is only suspended from the gallery for the rest of the current day or the next, depending on the infraction, but this rule change would prevent the same agitators from returning every day and disrupting proceedings.
Democrats interpreted the rule to mean that witnesses would not be allowed to testify before committees if the room had to be cleared and that “the people’s voices” would be silenced if disruptors were being permanently removed from observing proceedings.
Republican Rep. Jason Zachary responded to these objections, saying, “There is a decorum and a code of conduct in the gallery and everyone who is present at our proceedings. When we are elected as Representatives, we are the voice of the people. So, we keep having a conversation about the voice of the people, and you may not like it, but we are the voice of the people…In terms of participating, absolutely. People should be in the gallery, should be in the audience, but in terms of being a voice and speaking into the process, that is what we are elected to do.”
With the passage of the Republican rules package, the audience broke the decorum spoken of by Rep. Zachary and began shouting at committee members and singing the National Anthem.
Later in the afternoon, the House gaveled into session for approximately 10 minutes, just long enough for the body to officially adopt the rules for the session and Speaker Sexton to designate the members for each of the working committees: Congressional Redistricting, Finance, Ways, and Means, Calendar and Rules, and Resolutions.
The Senate gaveled in for around 30 minutes for similar proceedings, but members were granted more leniency to express their thoughts about the session overall. Each of the Democrats present condemned the session and redistricting efforts, with Sen. Raumesh Akbari calling it “an act of hate.” When both chambers adjourned for the day members went about their business, with many Democrats heading to press conferences and rallies.
Both chambers meet again this morning, and the committee sessions will follow the rest of the day as lawmakers consider the bills making necessary statutory changes to allow the maps to be redrawn between censuses and the new map proposals. Below are the bills set to be considered:
HB7001– Exempts the in-district living requirements for candidates for the 2026 election.
HB7002, HB7003, & HB7004– Delete the sections of state statute preventing the altering of the maps except after the census. (These will likely see some amending as all three bills appear identical as of this writing).
HB7005– Allows for the financial appropriations to cover the special session
HB7006– Democrat redistricting proposal (resembles the 2020 map and would see most of Nashville as its own congressional district)
All the bills will need to pass through the appointed committees before they can move to the House and Senate floor for further debate and a final vote.
Those floor votes could come as early as the morning of Thursday, May 7, but there was no timeline set by which the special session must adjourn in Gov. Lee’s official proclamation.
The Tennessee Conservative will have continuing coverage each day of the Extraordinary Session and will provide updates on these bills as the specifics are revealed and discussed.


About the Author: Olivia Lupia is a political refugee from Colorado who now calls Tennessee home. A proud follower of Christ, she views all political happenings through a Biblical lens and aims to utilize her knowledge and experience to educate and equip others. Olivia is an outspoken conservative who has run for local office, managed campaigns, and been highly involved with state & local GOPs, state legislatures, and other grassroots organizations and movements. Olivia can be reached at olivia@tennesseeconservativenews.com.

4 Responses
Racist; Dimmercrap derogatory term for realist.
If black candidates (or any candidates) ran on strong ideas, proven results, competence, and realistic policies instead of racial identity, anti-Trump hatred, and socialist daydreams, many more of them would win broad support from normal Americans of all races. The current problem is too many black Democrats running for office lean heavily into “victimhood” and “racial grievance” “equity” over equality “defund the police / soft-on-crime nonsense” and “socialist-style policies” (heavy redistribution, government control, high taxes) or just plain give me free… give me free… give me free.
These ideas have repeatedly failed wherever they’ve been tried whether in American cities like Chicago, Baltimore, and Detroit, or in countries like Venezuela, Cuba, or the old Soviet bloc. Yet they keep pushing them while calling anyone who disagrees “racist”. Counter-examples that prove the point…. black candidates who didn’t run that way have had much broader success i.e. Tim Scott (SC Senator) consistently wins with strong crossover appeal. Byron Donalds (Florida) rising star, wins in a diverse district. Winsome Earle-Sears (VA Lt. Governor) strong law-and-order conservative. Burgess Owens, John James, Wesley Hunt, etc.
These candidates focus on results, economy, crime, education, opportunity and they tend to do much better with the mix of White, Hispanic, and Asian voters. The harsh reality is a lot of the current black political leadership (especially in deep blue cities) treats politics as a racial patronage system rather than a contest of ideas. “Vote for me because I’m black and Trump is bad” only works inside heavily Democratic, racially monolithic districts that have been brainwashed. It doesn’t work when trying to win over normal mixed populations who just want lower crime, better schools, and a functioning economy. Merit still matters to most Americans. If more black candidates ran like Tim Scott instead of like Cori Bush or Jamal Bowman, the racial voting patterns would break down significantly. Identity politics has poisoned the system. When candidates lead with race and failed leftist ideology instead of competence, they deserve to lose regardless of skin color/race. The country would be better off if all voters of all races judged politicians strictly on character + results. Rant done…………………..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pFr0qvpxKI
Districts should consist of areas that are population based on proximity, that has NO race, religion or party affiliation consideration. The districts should contain approximately 700,000 legal residents (illegals don’t count since they should not be here anyway) Any high school STEM student (if we have any in TN with our current education system) could create an algorithm that could redraw the districts fairly. This would make it easier for the Representatives to pay attention to what their constituents need. People that live in the same area have more in common than those from other areas. Many East TN issues are different than Memphis or Nashville, rural versus urban. This is common sense. STOP THE GERRYMANDERING FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES AND START REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE. If we did this, there could be no legal challenge because it was based solely on where people live, not who they are.